Letter to the Editor.
We have to be open mind in all topic of Otolaryngology, sure, but we necessity to
encourage new research and new researcher.
Too much times, too strict peer review “cut the wings” to new enthusiastic research topic. In my opinion, we, like reviewers have to be severe in evaluation of research method,
statistic evaluation, references and language, but we should maintain open mind always in uncommon topic.
The aim of the research is discovery, discovery something “different or far” from common is the heart of innovation.
The “Linear thinking always” can make blind, sometimes “abstract thinking” can determinate, if the scientific propose is well organized, a brilliant discovery. My wish, dear Editor, is that our new journal can empathize and discover new research
and researchers to give a new push in Otolaryngology world.
I’m honoured and enthusiastic to be part of Otolaryngology – Open Journal, I’d like to talk to you about my idea of peer review. We have to be open mind in all topic of Otolaryngology, sure, but we necessity to encourage new research and new researcher.
Too much times, too strict peer review “cut the wings” to new enthusiastic research topic. In my opinion, we, like reviewers have to be severe in evaluation of research method, statistic evaluation, references and language, but we should maintain open mind always in uncommon topic. The aim of the research is discovery, discovery something “different or far” from common is the heart of innovation.
Otolaryngol Open J. 2015; 1(1): 1. doi: 10.17140/OTLOJ-1-101
